I'm psyched about the new Apple iPad and the upcoming iBook Store. The reason I'm not completely bent out of shape about the new device centers on the fact that it does what it is supposed to do and that's it.
"It doesn't multitask!" So what? About the only thing I would likely really want to multitask would be iTunes and maybe something like Pages or Keynote. The big thing is a lot of Apps, especially the games, now allow you to pull your audio over and run it in the App. Problem solved. Seriously, if I wanted to do major multitasking on the fly I'd pack a laptop.
Remember, this thing is not going to run major third party Apps like Photoshop or Office. So having several things open at once is not a major concern for most users. At work I often have Final Cut Pro, LiveType, iTunes, Safari, Photoshop and Indesign all running in different Spaces simultaneously. But that's on an 8-core system with 16GB of Ram and a heck of a graphics engine. When I want to do major manipulation to photos, video or even extensive work with something like Keynote, it's going to happen on the desktop.
The main things that I would see myself using it for are as follows: Sharing my portfolio. Apple pushes the idea of sharing your vacation and family albums from iPhoto with friends and family on the run. It also works nicely as a digital photo frame when charging on the optional dock. But what Apple failed to hit on is the possibilities this device offers working graphics, photography and video professionals. It just might be the best portable device for sharing your work with potential clients.
It's a sleek and sophisticated device and perfect for the mobile professional. I'd use it to display wedding portfolio images, slideshows, marketing graphics and even film to clients and potential partners. I often meet clients in a relaxed atmosphere like a coffee shop. Pulling this small, light and highly capable device out of a portable sleeve would make the presentation both beautiful and unique. Tons of multimedia professionals are going to pocket (almost literally) these things as tools of their trade.
It is obviously going to be an excellent iTunes video playback device for road trips. For someone who travels often to cover sporting events throughout the southeast and internationally to work with orphans and communities in need, this could prove an ideal travel companion.Checking email, surfing the web, sharing photos and using Apps can all be done with supposedly excellent battery life in a light weight and small profile tablet. The optional photographic accessors which include an SD card reader and USB connection hub should prove valuable to photographers of every style. Ideally either Apple or a third party should create a Compact Flash device since all professional cameras use these media cards. I don't see pros using it as a proofing system for immediate image feedback, but it would be a useful tool on the go as long as it is used within the limits of the devices storage capabilities. For travel and vacation work it should be an exceptionally good tool. If Apple ever rebuilds a full or scaled down version of iPhoto for the device like they did for the iWork suite that would just up the ante for such purposes.
Using the apparently incredible calendar, contacts and notes applications. Without personal experience with these apps it's tough to say exactly how good they can be, but everything points to a far better experience than even the iPhone can deliver. For someone who has to keep up with the schedules of ten athletics teams, my personal work assignments, social activities and my freelance photography and videography work, the calendar application would prove invaluable. I'm also a fan of the Notes app on the iPhone and using it on a larger display could also prove helpful.
The Pages, Numbers and Keynote applications will appeal to a lot of people. For me, Pages would be a definite yes with Keynote coming in a close second. I don't do a lot with Keynote in my line of work, but for $10, you never know. I do use it for teaching photography class and I use it as a large preview/remote device for those presentations. Pages would prove a great productivity application for writing articles on the fly, logging field notes and keeping a travel journal.
And finally, iBooks. This could be cool. Personally, I'm not a huge fan of reading on the Kindle or the Sony Reader. I really like the technology, especially in bright light, but they did such a good job of making the displays look like pages, that, well, it's just like a page. Maybe I'm an odd duck, but I really like reading articles on my iPhone even though the screen is small. It's backlit and easy to read in the dark. And, oddly enough, it's easier on my eyes than the previously mentioned devices. So, regardless of your screen type preference, the interface on the iPad is exceptional. Not only can you change the font size and the font, the interactivity of the book and pages is just play cool and natural. With books being able to embed not only photos, but videos, it brings new life to a once stagnant medium. Now, how could they make this better. Well, if I were smart enough to design my own App that could add usability to the iBooks application, I would add highlighting and the ability to embed notes. The major reason why I have not left the paper book world for the digital counterpart ,even though I love the Green appeal, is because I highlight text and write notes in the margins. If Apple or someone were to add these two features to iBooks then I'd be far more likely to buy the titles of interest in the iBook Store. The features seem rather easy to implement. Just have an opaque color option in the menu bar that you can apply with the touch of a finger. You could simply use the same feature that Apple uses to Copy on the iPhone. Simply tap and hold and then drag the bars where you want them to start and stop and then fill it with the desired color. Adding a note could be simple too. Adding a toggle or pin that when tapped would expand into a note window for making notations about the text, responses or ideas would further enhance the usability of iBooks. It would also likely help promote the addition of college and professional text books to the iBook Store. The last thing, and perhaps the main thing that users are most potential buyers are likely curious about is what titles will be available. When the iTunes store first launched it was difficult to get older tracks and many new releases. That has been improved greatly over the years. With the popularity of iTunes it is likely that publishers will catch on and fast. We will see in the coming months just how many titles - other than major best sellers which will undoubtedly be available - will make their way into the iBook Store.
My final thoughts? I will probably get one. I will, for a time, use it in place of a laptop since I have plenty of power on my desk. Personal use always reveals the strengths and weaknesses that we either didn't know existed or under or overestimated in our preliminary thoughts about the item. Only time will tell, but I'm looking forward to getting one and putting it through the paces. If I had to predict now, it will likely be one of my favorite devices for both productivity and entertainment. The only question now is to 3G or not to 3G. For complete versatility and resale value (just in case) the 3G build is the way to go. But the extra $130 plus the monthly data plan does leave room to question this. But, hey, we have 60-90 days to ponder it. Until we all get our hands on one, we can only wait and hope that it's as well executed as we've been led to believe.
February 3, 2010
December 3, 2009
Apple Magic Mouse review
After waiting over a week for the Apple Magic Mouse to arrive, I finally received it over the weekend and had the opportunity to start working with it a few days ago. And in that time I've concluded that for the non-gamer it just might be the best mouse ever designed.What makes the Magic Mouse so much better than its predecessor, the Mighty Mouse, is, well, everything.
In the previous rendition Apple added sensitivity to the click "buttons" and eliminated the actual need for an independent button for each side of the mouse.
That same philosophy carries over to the Magic Mouse with the entire device being really a single clicking button. The sensitive technology is still built in and though there are a few little hiccups that do carry over from its Mighty brother, the device overall is much better built and with a significantly more redefined sensitivity system.
Let's talk about the little issues that do carry over from the first generation all white mouse. For starters, as I've mentioned, there is only a single clicking surface. The mouse uses touch sensitivity to identify the intended task, e.g. the left or right click function. The one drawback of this - if it can be defined as such - is that for right-handed users you must raise your index finger in order to right click with your middle finger. If you don't the unit cannot distinguish your command and if anything will usually default to the standard left button click.
The mouse is ambidextrous programmable and because of its symmetrical design it is identical in use for both the left and right and, just tell the program (under system preferences) your desired orientation.
The mouse loses the twin side click surfaces found on the previous mouse. My opinion on that is - Thanks! They always activated undesirable features of the OS because I would accidentally grab them while working on a project or surfing the web. I finally deactivated those controls in the preferences menu. If you liked that feature, more power to you, but if you want the Magic you have to sacrifice that feature of the Mighty.
Though the most notable feature of the new mouse is the touch sensitivity, which I will discuss in a moment, one of the best features that I think new users will notice is the improved bottom design. The bottom is now almost entirely aluminum and smaller. The on off switch is very simple and the green light gives a clear indication of the connection - or lack there of. All of these nice design features out of the way however, and you'll notice what I think is one of the best features of this mouse - the sled base.
The previous base glided, and sometimes stuck, on a glossy plastic ring that ran the circumference of the mouse base. This would easily get covered in dirt and grime and you'd have to scrape it of with you nail or other hard instrument. Even then it never really "glided" to me.
The magic mouse rests on a pair of sled-like skis. These provide much smoother motion in my opinion and are better suited for extended use.
I have not idea if Apple redesigned the optical guide or not, but it seem more accurate and responsive.
Finally, we come to the touch sensitivity feature and the best feature not on the Magic mouse at all. The most improved feature of the mouse is without question the track ball. The previous version did let you do 360 degree navigation, but the ball would easily become dirty over time and it was virtually impossible to clean because Apple didn't make it user cleanable. I had both a wired and Blutooth version of the Mighty Mouse and both of them ran into this problem. One of them - the wired version - finally quit scrolling up all together.
The Magic Mouse eliminates this problem by incorporating Apple's touch technology to the mouse surface. Just like an iPhone or iPod Touch or the newer track pads on the MacBooks, the surface can respond to finger gestures. The sensitivity works effortlessly and is superb in both internet browsing and visual applications like iPhoto and Photoshop.
You will likely use it most often for scrolling up and down internet pages and for browsing through photos (left and right flicks), but you can also navigate around a large page or photo by simply directing your finger along the top of the surface. In addition, you can two finger flick to progress forward and back through pages in a single navigation window (i.e. you can two finger flick from right to left to view the previous page instead of clicking the "Back" button). You can also use the two finger gesture in other applications, but I find it really unnecessary at this time. Also, depending on your finger dexterity, you might actually find this task slightly complicated. Unlike a laptop track pad that stays still, allowing you to raise and lower your hand as a whole, you have to hold the mouse while doing it. I typically control the mouse with my thumb and little finger with my ring finger resting. When I try to two-finger flick, it is not exactly comfortable and the results can be interesting - depending on use - if you're not great at it like me.
So, if your a hand gymnast then you'll love this feature, but the two-finger flick is not my favorite part of the mouse and I rarely use it. Overall though, the scroll functionality is awesome, though sensitive and can cause unwanted moving in Photoshop at full screen or on the web.
In summary, the Magic Mouse is a more than worthy upgrade from the often problematic Mighty Mouse. The setup and functionality are very easy and the touch interface is incredibly useful and leave no more worry about dirt getting in the guide toggle. If you prefer more of an organic design with a higher rise to rest your palm or are a gamer who wants lots of buttons or a massive track ball, then look elsewhere. If you want a simple, elegant and well designed mouse that is likely to be maintanance free then the Apple Magic Mouse just might be for you.
December 2, 2009
Wacom Intuos4 review
I have been using a Wacom Intuos3 medium size graphics tablet for several years now. I have long been a fan of the benefits that the tablet provides, namely the pen/paper ergonomics for a more natural editing approach that a mouse, or worse, a track pad simply cannot duplicate.
The new Intuos4 offers more sensitivity, an elegant charcoal gray finish, illuminated task button indicators, a navigation wheel and convenient ambidextrous layout, an improved pen holder with multiple tips housed within and a thinner overall footprint.
The most notable improvement is the button layout and indicator lights. Previously, you had to remember which button did what and there were only four really. There where eight total, but only four could be used by the free hand on the appropriate side of the tablet while the other hand did the pen work. The new model offers eight buttons all on the same side of the device and the blue lit LEDs to the right of each button tell you what that button is designated for - a very helpful feature. The illumination can be adjusted to four different levels of brightness ranging from off to fully bright - also a great feature.
The other thing missing from the previous generation is the touch sensitive slide groove that zoomed in and out of images and up and down pages and the like. It has been replaced by a rotary dial with a center select wheel. This not only zooms in and out of images, but also acts as a jog dial when accessing extended options with some of the other button sets. For example, in Photoshop CS4, when you select the first of the four jog indicator lights (there are four), the scroll wheel zooms in and out of the image. When you select the last jog dial indicator light, the scroll wheel rotates the image. The wheel is touch sensitive and does not actually move. The wheel also scrolls up and down on web pages. Each of the settings is fully customizable as is the touch sensitivity and speed.
I use the default settings, but the buttons are customizable to a wide variety of settings. The default are a question mark which gives you a heads up display on the computer monitor of the button configurations. The second button down brings up a virtual navigation menu on the monitor that features options for "command," "www", "media" and "e-mail". These will give you quick access to some of the most used sources on your computer. The latter three are pretty straight forward, but the Command feature might not be. It basically gives you quick access to features like save, cut, paste, undo, etc. Personally I don't use this button. I prefer keyboard shortcuts, well, on the keyboard.
The next button down is "Precision Mode" followed by "Display Toggle". The former, when activated, makes for more precise and less figity movements on-screen. This can help tremendously when drawing or outlining in a graphics program as it slows down the pointer for more control. This function only works while holding down the button and is not designed for prolonged use - it would tremendously slow down your work flow.
The later is a toggle that can be used when using multiple displays. This is hugely beneficial. If you have ever worked with multiple displays you know that the Wacom mapping stretches both screens by default. So, if you are working on a large display for example and want to move over to a palate on another screen, you could drag all the way back and forth. This can cause problems because you effectively change the range of motion when you spread the mapping over two monitors. The Toggle button can jump your mapping between screens and eliminates this problem. working on one display and want to access tools on another, just hit the button and the mapping jumps over to the other monitor. Press it again to jump back. The previous version might have offered something a little similar, but I never used it and it certainly was not this simple.
Below the wheel is another set of four function buttons that default to your most used options: shift, option, command (Apple) and move (hand). I leave my tablet to the default setting (but increased the brightness of the LEDs all the way up) and I have no problems with the standard setup. If you are used to the previous version the button layout will take a little getting used to, but will be better - I think you'll find - in the long run.
Other differences are in the actual sensitivity area. The surface is more of a matte finish and less smooth and glossy than the previous version - which I really liked. It might take some getting used to and I'd recommend trying all of the different pen tips to figure out which is best for you. I found that the standard black tip works best for me. You get on in the pen itself and five replacements. It also comes with three gray tips, one spring-loaded white tip and a slightly rubberized tip. They fit conveniently in the base of the pen holder so they wont get lost and the tip removal tool is there as well.
The pen is excellent and is over an inch shorter than the previous pen. The grip is not as slick as the version 3 pen and provides a more secure fit. The pen is fully customizable as well when it comes to the buttons and the grip cover. The Intuos4 also comes with a variety of ring colors that can be added to the tip area of the pen. This not only gives a color splash, but if you purchase additional pens and keep each supplied with a different tip, then you could color code which pen is which. Just a thought.
The unit also includes a mouse, but I never use it. It functions much like a normal mouse on the Wacom surface. I prefer just using the pen for everything or using my Apple Magic Mouse. I put mine back in the box.
Moving back to the tablet, there are a few other features that many users will really like. For one, the USB cord is REMOVABLE! On the Intuos three, you could not do this and had to wrap the cord around the tablet when you wanted to transport it. The new version is completely separate and you plug it in when you need it. Another great feature is the ability to choose your USB connection port. The tablet has two separate USB outlets that are selected by sliding a trap door up or down to reveal the appropriate port. This is excellent since right and left-handed users can now have the SAME tablet set up. For example, right-handed users will place the buttons and scroll wheel to the left and select the upper right USB port and choose the right-handed option in the system preferences menu. For left-handed users it's the opposite. The buttons are to the right and switching the trap door now allows the USB cord to be at the top on the left side of the unit. Selecting left-handed use from the preferences menu will tell the tablet to flip the LED icons properly.
Overall this is an exceptional tablet and superior in every way to the Intuos3. Does that make the previous version obsolete? Absolutely not. But it does make jumping to the newer version more worth the investment. At $350-400 for the medium size unit, the Wacom tablets are by no means cheap, but if you've never used one and do any type of photographic retouching or graphics work, you'll quickly wonder how you every worked without one. If you have an aging Intuos3 and are considering the upgrade, it is, in my opinion very much worth the cost. If you have no issues with your current unit and don't need the increase sensitivity or the increase button layout, then stick with what you have.
Conclusion: This is a wonderful accessory that is simply a must-have for professional photographers and graphic designers. It's feature set is the most complete of any tablet I've ever worked with and there are no drawbacks to mention save the slight difference in surface texture - which you get used to. The medium version is the perfect size for most users and the unit quickly pays for itself through precise selections and time saved. I wholeheartedly recommend the Wacom Intuos4 series graphics tablet.
The new Intuos4 offers more sensitivity, an elegant charcoal gray finish, illuminated task button indicators, a navigation wheel and convenient ambidextrous layout, an improved pen holder with multiple tips housed within and a thinner overall footprint.
The most notable improvement is the button layout and indicator lights. Previously, you had to remember which button did what and there were only four really. There where eight total, but only four could be used by the free hand on the appropriate side of the tablet while the other hand did the pen work. The new model offers eight buttons all on the same side of the device and the blue lit LEDs to the right of each button tell you what that button is designated for - a very helpful feature. The illumination can be adjusted to four different levels of brightness ranging from off to fully bright - also a great feature.
Images are from Wacom. Click on any image to go to the Wacom website.
The other thing missing from the previous generation is the touch sensitive slide groove that zoomed in and out of images and up and down pages and the like. It has been replaced by a rotary dial with a center select wheel. This not only zooms in and out of images, but also acts as a jog dial when accessing extended options with some of the other button sets. For example, in Photoshop CS4, when you select the first of the four jog indicator lights (there are four), the scroll wheel zooms in and out of the image. When you select the last jog dial indicator light, the scroll wheel rotates the image. The wheel is touch sensitive and does not actually move. The wheel also scrolls up and down on web pages. Each of the settings is fully customizable as is the touch sensitivity and speed.
I use the default settings, but the buttons are customizable to a wide variety of settings. The default are a question mark which gives you a heads up display on the computer monitor of the button configurations. The second button down brings up a virtual navigation menu on the monitor that features options for "command," "www", "media" and "e-mail". These will give you quick access to some of the most used sources on your computer. The latter three are pretty straight forward, but the Command feature might not be. It basically gives you quick access to features like save, cut, paste, undo, etc. Personally I don't use this button. I prefer keyboard shortcuts, well, on the keyboard.
The next button down is "Precision Mode" followed by "Display Toggle". The former, when activated, makes for more precise and less figity movements on-screen. This can help tremendously when drawing or outlining in a graphics program as it slows down the pointer for more control. This function only works while holding down the button and is not designed for prolonged use - it would tremendously slow down your work flow.
The later is a toggle that can be used when using multiple displays. This is hugely beneficial. If you have ever worked with multiple displays you know that the Wacom mapping stretches both screens by default. So, if you are working on a large display for example and want to move over to a palate on another screen, you could drag all the way back and forth. This can cause problems because you effectively change the range of motion when you spread the mapping over two monitors. The Toggle button can jump your mapping between screens and eliminates this problem. working on one display and want to access tools on another, just hit the button and the mapping jumps over to the other monitor. Press it again to jump back. The previous version might have offered something a little similar, but I never used it and it certainly was not this simple.
Below the wheel is another set of four function buttons that default to your most used options: shift, option, command (Apple) and move (hand). I leave my tablet to the default setting (but increased the brightness of the LEDs all the way up) and I have no problems with the standard setup. If you are used to the previous version the button layout will take a little getting used to, but will be better - I think you'll find - in the long run.
Other differences are in the actual sensitivity area. The surface is more of a matte finish and less smooth and glossy than the previous version - which I really liked. It might take some getting used to and I'd recommend trying all of the different pen tips to figure out which is best for you. I found that the standard black tip works best for me. You get on in the pen itself and five replacements. It also comes with three gray tips, one spring-loaded white tip and a slightly rubberized tip. They fit conveniently in the base of the pen holder so they wont get lost and the tip removal tool is there as well.
The pen is excellent and is over an inch shorter than the previous pen. The grip is not as slick as the version 3 pen and provides a more secure fit. The pen is fully customizable as well when it comes to the buttons and the grip cover. The Intuos4 also comes with a variety of ring colors that can be added to the tip area of the pen. This not only gives a color splash, but if you purchase additional pens and keep each supplied with a different tip, then you could color code which pen is which. Just a thought.
The unit also includes a mouse, but I never use it. It functions much like a normal mouse on the Wacom surface. I prefer just using the pen for everything or using my Apple Magic Mouse. I put mine back in the box.
Moving back to the tablet, there are a few other features that many users will really like. For one, the USB cord is REMOVABLE! On the Intuos three, you could not do this and had to wrap the cord around the tablet when you wanted to transport it. The new version is completely separate and you plug it in when you need it. Another great feature is the ability to choose your USB connection port. The tablet has two separate USB outlets that are selected by sliding a trap door up or down to reveal the appropriate port. This is excellent since right and left-handed users can now have the SAME tablet set up. For example, right-handed users will place the buttons and scroll wheel to the left and select the upper right USB port and choose the right-handed option in the system preferences menu. For left-handed users it's the opposite. The buttons are to the right and switching the trap door now allows the USB cord to be at the top on the left side of the unit. Selecting left-handed use from the preferences menu will tell the tablet to flip the LED icons properly.
Overall this is an exceptional tablet and superior in every way to the Intuos3. Does that make the previous version obsolete? Absolutely not. But it does make jumping to the newer version more worth the investment. At $350-400 for the medium size unit, the Wacom tablets are by no means cheap, but if you've never used one and do any type of photographic retouching or graphics work, you'll quickly wonder how you every worked without one. If you have an aging Intuos3 and are considering the upgrade, it is, in my opinion very much worth the cost. If you have no issues with your current unit and don't need the increase sensitivity or the increase button layout, then stick with what you have.
Conclusion: This is a wonderful accessory that is simply a must-have for professional photographers and graphic designers. It's feature set is the most complete of any tablet I've ever worked with and there are no drawbacks to mention save the slight difference in surface texture - which you get used to. The medium version is the perfect size for most users and the unit quickly pays for itself through precise selections and time saved. I wholeheartedly recommend the Wacom Intuos4 series graphics tablet.
Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II first impressions
The newer version promises improved VR (vibration reduction) performance, sharper images with more contrast and better color as well as the elimination (or vast reduction) of vignettes caused by the previous addition on FX (full frame) sensors.
Though I've only had my copy for a few days, I've done some very brief testing and have reported my findings here. I hope to a update this post when I have had more time with this optic in the field.
For starters, the lens is about the same size and weight as the first generation. The new rendition is wider on the back end and carries this trait uniformly throughout it's length. The previous version was wide near the front element and tapered at the manual focusing ring to provide a narrower profile for the bulk of the body.
Click on any images to see them larger
The above image shows the previous edition (left) and the newer version (right). The newer lens is slightly shorter than the first generation and wider throughout. Overall, they feel about the same in terms of weight, but the newer version may be slightly better balanced in my opinion. I actually like the tapered ergonomics of the original lens, but it's not a deal-breaker for the new one.
The lens hood for the new model (show to the right) is significantly shorter and lighter than that which adorned the pervious lens (left). This results in a slightly less intrusive presentation and can make a notable difference when packing the lenses. The image below shows both versions of the lens with the hood mounted in the inverted position.
Because the lens is slightly narrower as a package when the hood is mounted, the newer version does make for slightly better packing. The overall length being shorter also helps in this arena. Though this can be negligible depending on your bag and how you pack your gear, it is noticeable in my Kata MC-61 where I pack the lens sideways.
Another place to note a difference in the lens hood is in the curvature of the long "petal" elements of the hoods. As seen below, the first version is flatter in nature than the newer one. The original version is also thicker and more sturdy overall. This has no impact on the hood's ability to reduce light falling in the lens, but will surprise some photographers who are prone to standing the lens on it's hood. Standing the lens up vertically, especially with a camera mounted, is not exactly good practice, but we sometimes do it. Especially if we are in an environment where lenses need to be changed quite a bit - like in the studio. One may line up the non-mounted lenses for quick access when changing optics. With round metal hoods like those on, say, the 85mm f/1.4 lens, this isn't a big deal (I keep mine on it while is packed), but for less stable flower petal style hoods this can be risky; especially in windy environments or where there is heavy traffic. This new hood really prevents you from being able to do that because the curvature of the longer petals is just significant enough to topple the lens if you try to rest it on it's hood. A word to the wise - don't do it.
One of the things I heard some of the pros discuss - when they got their hands on early releases of the lens - was an improvement in contrast, color and clarity (sharpness). They also claimed that the VR was noticeably better. I have not had enough time with the lens to comment on it's AF performance or low light VR abilities yet, but in my quick test shots, the lens does appear to deliver on the three "C"s as well as in the vignette department.
With the first generation, there was some distortion at the edges of the frame and some vignetting (dark halos at the image edge) on images taken with an FX sensor, particularly at wider apertures. Adjusting the camera's vignette correction control did help with this, but didn't completely eliminate it.
The newer version, just in my quick test fire images, did very well in edge distortion and vignetting. I don't shoot in a lab and analyze everything under a microscope like some reviewers. This is simply my feedback on real-world use. As a sports, wedding and portrait photographer I need fast, reliable glass that delivers the best image quality possible, and to me the new VR II makes strides in this area.
Below are two images shot using the pervious generation (left) and the updated version (right). My framing is slightly off, but the comparison should still show some notable results. The image of Jama (student assistant) on the right has more contrast and no vignetting. The image on the left shows slight vignetting at the far corners. Both images were shot at 200mm at ISO 400 at f/4 and 1/500th. Both images were shot handheld from a stable position with VR ON and in NORMAL mode. It was on an overcast day and there was no change in light as the images were shot just seconds apart. Even though framing is slightly off, the camera was set to center weighted metering and the images can be considered virtually identical.
The images below show a crop of the above images. The crops are exactly the same size and from the same location in the photographs. These crops were made to reveal sharpness and the slightly closer crop with the older lens (left) should give that version a very slight advantage over the image to the right, but the results show that the new VR II lens does seem to produce sharper images right out of the camera. I took a series of images at various focal lengths and settings and tried to pick the two that were most similar in every way to be fair.
The image on the right is noticeable sharper than the image to the left. This was consistent with various images taken at the same time.
Is this exhaustive proof that the newer VR II is hands down the better optic by far? No. But from my brief experience it does seem to be an improvement and produces images that are equal to the previous version at worst and significantly better at best. Is it worth $500 more than the original version? That remains to be seen from a full blown handling and results perspective, but from the preliminary results, on an FX sensor, I'd have to say, for me, yes. I shoot sports, weddings, portraits, album artwork and more, and if there is a lens available that arguably produces better contrast and more sharpness and may work better in low light, then it's worth the extra coin. I want the best images I can get right out of the camera and, so far, the VR II is proving itself.
I will likely not do a follow-up side by side comparison, rather simply remark on the handling and overall performance differences after I have a few thousand images under my belt. I'll be using it to do some portraits, action shots and a wedding in the next several weeks and hope to get another article up toward the beginning of the year.
As a side note, if you use the Really Right Stuff system, their website indicates that the replacement foot they designed for the original lens will also work with the VR II. It does slide on and lock down easily, but the new lens has a slight taper on the slide plate and this results in a slightly downward angling of the lens. This is not decremental, simply adjust the head backward, but it should be noted just in case.
As always, I'm simply one voice in a million. I don't have a degree in physics and am not an imaging expert. I am, however, a professional who takes his artwork seriously and my reviews are my opinions based on products I have personally used and/or own. I am not compensated in any way for my opinions. I place them here for the benefit of others and to offer a perspective that can be added to the comments and tests of others to provide potential buyers with a broader scope with which to arm themselves when considering new or used equipment.
Until next time, happy shooting.
- R
October 10, 2009
Pretty please Nikon...
Call me a back and forth kind of photographer, but I like shooting with the gear that best matches my shooting situations. I started off with a Canon camera when I shot 35mm film; a camera that I got for Christmas from my mother when I was in my mid teens. After my wife and I got married, we decided to take a weekend trip to Sedona, Arizona, to shoot the red rocks and nearby rivers and streams. Upon leaving town I realized the iris in my 35mm lens was hung so we went to the mall to get a new one. When we returned to our trip I had a new Nikon film camera with a few third party lenses.
When the D70 became available I quickly switched to digital for the work flow convenience and speed. Later I bumped up to the D2X and never had any issues. Then the price of the Canon EOS 5D began to drop and the "affordable" full frame was enough to draw me back to Canon. I wanted the high resolution and full frame for my graphics and wedding work and acquired a used 1D Mark II for my sports shooting.
The 5D eventually ran into a problem with the batter terminal and I had to send it off for repair which Canon did for free, minus shipping. Then the shutter went out on the 1D Mark II at about 120,000 actuations (less than half the rated value) and I had to send it to Atlanta to get fixed - $350. Then my 50mm f/1.8 quit focusing and started grinding. I sent it off to Canon and again the fixed it for free minus shipping.
When Nikon released the D300 I moved back over to Nikon. It was the first affordable camera that would shoot 8 fps (with the grip) and the noise control was way better than the D2X. Then came the announcement of the D3 followed by the D700. I sold my D300 and went for the D700.
For my type of shooting the D700 is about 95% perfect. It's about the size and cost of the 5D, has the full frame FX sensor, knock your socks off noise control, better build (in my opinion) and will rack off 8 fps with the grip just like the D300. Because I shoot sports, portraits, weddings and large promotional graphic materials, I need all of these features. If anything, I wish the sensor had a tad more resolution to offer than the 12 MP, but for most stuff it's more than fine. An 18MP would be about perfect if it could hold the noise levels that the D700 currently does at 1600-6400.
So, what is it that Nikon doesn't currently offer that I (ok, EVERY Nikon shooter) want to see? Faster primes with newer technology! We were dying for a revamped 70-200mm for better performance on FX and we finally got it (well, in Nov.). We also recently got an AF-S version of the 50mm which is a tad slow on the AF, but quiet and accurate. Now, we need updates to the 35mm, 85mm and 135mm. I'd love to see an AF-S 35mm Nikkor f/1.4G , an AF-S 85mm f/1.4G VRII N and an AF-S 135mm f/2 VR II N. While we're at it, give us a AF-S 24mm f/1.4G too.
This is one area that Nikon has trailed the pack, especially Canon. They now offer more camera bodies than anyone else, but their lens upgrades are really coming slowly. The old AF D versions are fantastic (if available), but all of these state of the art bodies - especially the D700, D3 and D3X - could use the newer glass.
Nikon, stop worrying about putting HD video in every camera model and calling it "New". If we get a D3s that just adds video I'm going to throw up. Bump the resolution, keep the same noise control, and video then we'll bite - maybe, but adding video and an "s" isn't going to change the minds of that many users.
Canon is far and away the optics leader with regard to speed, IS (VR equivalent) and USM (AF-S equivalent). We need some faster glass with AF-S and the N features. Throw VR into the 85 and 135 and you take a huge lead even if your 85 isn't a 1.2.
I considered moving back to Canon because of the faster glass, but I'm sticking with my Nikon. I love it more than any Canon I've fired and they've always been more reliable, but I'm begging you Nikon, PLEASE give us some newer optics!
Other things I'd love to see:
D700x for $3,200 or less (I'll just keep dreaming. Even if the camera does show up in late 2010, that price is a fantasy)
AF-S 80-400mm f/4-5.6VR II N
AF-S 100-500mm f/4-5.6 VR II N
When the D70 became available I quickly switched to digital for the work flow convenience and speed. Later I bumped up to the D2X and never had any issues. Then the price of the Canon EOS 5D began to drop and the "affordable" full frame was enough to draw me back to Canon. I wanted the high resolution and full frame for my graphics and wedding work and acquired a used 1D Mark II for my sports shooting.
The 5D eventually ran into a problem with the batter terminal and I had to send it off for repair which Canon did for free, minus shipping. Then the shutter went out on the 1D Mark II at about 120,000 actuations (less than half the rated value) and I had to send it to Atlanta to get fixed - $350. Then my 50mm f/1.8 quit focusing and started grinding. I sent it off to Canon and again the fixed it for free minus shipping.
When Nikon released the D300 I moved back over to Nikon. It was the first affordable camera that would shoot 8 fps (with the grip) and the noise control was way better than the D2X. Then came the announcement of the D3 followed by the D700. I sold my D300 and went for the D700.
For my type of shooting the D700 is about 95% perfect. It's about the size and cost of the 5D, has the full frame FX sensor, knock your socks off noise control, better build (in my opinion) and will rack off 8 fps with the grip just like the D300. Because I shoot sports, portraits, weddings and large promotional graphic materials, I need all of these features. If anything, I wish the sensor had a tad more resolution to offer than the 12 MP, but for most stuff it's more than fine. An 18MP would be about perfect if it could hold the noise levels that the D700 currently does at 1600-6400.
So, what is it that Nikon doesn't currently offer that I (ok, EVERY Nikon shooter) want to see? Faster primes with newer technology! We were dying for a revamped 70-200mm for better performance on FX and we finally got it (well, in Nov.). We also recently got an AF-S version of the 50mm which is a tad slow on the AF, but quiet and accurate. Now, we need updates to the 35mm, 85mm and 135mm. I'd love to see an AF-S 35mm Nikkor f/1.4G , an AF-S 85mm f/1.4G VRII N and an AF-S 135mm f/2 VR II N. While we're at it, give us a AF-S 24mm f/1.4G too.
This is one area that Nikon has trailed the pack, especially Canon. They now offer more camera bodies than anyone else, but their lens upgrades are really coming slowly. The old AF D versions are fantastic (if available), but all of these state of the art bodies - especially the D700, D3 and D3X - could use the newer glass.
Nikon, stop worrying about putting HD video in every camera model and calling it "New". If we get a D3s that just adds video I'm going to throw up. Bump the resolution, keep the same noise control, and video then we'll bite - maybe, but adding video and an "s" isn't going to change the minds of that many users.
Canon is far and away the optics leader with regard to speed, IS (VR equivalent) and USM (AF-S equivalent). We need some faster glass with AF-S and the N features. Throw VR into the 85 and 135 and you take a huge lead even if your 85 isn't a 1.2.
I considered moving back to Canon because of the faster glass, but I'm sticking with my Nikon. I love it more than any Canon I've fired and they've always been more reliable, but I'm begging you Nikon, PLEASE give us some newer optics!
Other things I'd love to see:
D700x for $3,200 or less (I'll just keep dreaming. Even if the camera does show up in late 2010, that price is a fantasy)
AF-S 80-400mm f/4-5.6VR II N
AF-S 100-500mm f/4-5.6 VR II N
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)